<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TAG Heuer&#8217;s 1887 Calibre: In-house Design?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/</link>
	<description>Reviews and news of TAG Heuer watches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TAG Heuer Shoots Itself In the Foot on TAG Heuer Caliber 1887 Launch &#171; Perpetuelle.com Watch Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/comment-page-1/#comment-14438</link>
		<dc:creator>TAG Heuer Shoots Itself In the Foot on TAG Heuer Caliber 1887 Launch &#171; Perpetuelle.com Watch Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 14:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calibre11.com/?p=1181#comment-14438</guid>
		<description>[...] now unfolding at TAG Heuer, where CEO J.C. Babin&#8217;s remarks can be seen on watch blogs such as Calibre 11 and watch forums such as Watchuseek &#8211; as he defends what now appears to be overly aggressive [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now unfolding at TAG Heuer, where CEO J.C. Babin&#8217;s remarks can be seen on watch blogs such as Calibre 11 and watch forums such as Watchuseek &#8211; as he defends what now appears to be overly aggressive [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tag Calibre 1887 &#8211; A case of overzealous marketing? &#124; Chronometry</title>
		<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/comment-page-1/#comment-12723</link>
		<dc:creator>Tag Calibre 1887 &#8211; A case of overzealous marketing? &#124; Chronometry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calibre11.com/?p=1181#comment-12723</guid>
		<description>[...] iii) Blog post on Calibre 11 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iii) Blog post on Calibre 11 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is the Difference between Vertical Clutch and Oscilating Pinion?</title>
		<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/comment-page-1/#comment-4635</link>
		<dc:creator>What is the Difference between Vertical Clutch and Oscilating Pinion?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 17:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calibre11.com/?p=1181#comment-4635</guid>
		<description>[...]  Here is a link to the Calibre 11 auto chronograph used in the new Tag 1887:   TAG Heuer&#039;s 1887 Calibre: In-house Design? &#124; Calibre 11        &quot;My automatic watch is smarter than yours&quot; - Seiko Spring Drive           Reply [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Here is a link to the Calibre 11 auto chronograph used in the new Tag 1887:   TAG Heuer&#039;s 1887 Calibre: In-house Design? | Calibre 11        &quot;My automatic watch is smarter than yours&quot; &#8211; Seiko Spring Drive           Reply [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2009: Heuer and TAG Heuer Year in Review &#124; Calibre 11</title>
		<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>2009: Heuer and TAG Heuer Year in Review &#124; Calibre 11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 04:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calibre11.com/?p=1181#comment-319</guid>
		<description>[...] Calibre 1887 Controversy: By some margin this was the most read story on Calibre 11- partly because the story was picked up [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Calibre 1887 Controversy: By some margin this was the most read story on Calibre 11- partly because the story was picked up [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/comment-page-1/#comment-286</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 04:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calibre11.com/?p=1181#comment-286</guid>
		<description>In-house is in-house. Highly modified base movement is highly modified base mvnt. That ultimately is the bottom line; no need to get &quot;technical&quot; with terms, lawyers, and internet rage.
Any monkey can throw any number of catch-phrases, try to redefine understood terminology, and make something sound more sophisticated than what it really is. Come on, let&#039;s be honest with each other here; someone at Tag dropped the ball on marketing the new 1887 and it got passed through management somehow. Maybe they&#039;re trying to play us for fools? Maybe they thought we wouldn&#039;t notice? Maybe they wanted to generate negative publicity at launch? Regardless, someone should take responsibility, salvage this situation with dignity, and attempt to build credibility with the fans again.
Other design houses may be mocking the launch of the 1887, but I wouldn&#039;t pay attention to them. Continue doing what you need to do, and keep innovating. Mr. CEO, thanks for coming forward. Playing damage control like this, I believe, is only the first step.
Best Regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In-house is in-house. Highly modified base movement is highly modified base mvnt. That ultimately is the bottom line; no need to get &#8220;technical&#8221; with terms, lawyers, and internet rage.</p>
<p>Any monkey can throw any number of catch-phrases, try to redefine understood terminology, and make something sound more sophisticated than what it really is. Come on, let&#8217;s be honest with each other here; someone at Tag dropped the ball on marketing the new 1887 and it got passed through management somehow. Maybe they&#8217;re trying to play us for fools? Maybe they thought we wouldn&#8217;t notice? Maybe they wanted to generate negative publicity at launch? Regardless, someone should take responsibility, salvage this situation with dignity, and attempt to build credibility with the fans again.</p>
<p>Other design houses may be mocking the launch of the 1887, but I wouldn&#8217;t pay attention to them. Continue doing what you need to do, and keep innovating. Mr. CEO, thanks for coming forward. Playing damage control like this, I believe, is only the first step.</p>
<p>Best Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TAG Heuer Calibre 1887- Update &#124; Calibre 11</title>
		<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/comment-page-1/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>TAG Heuer Calibre 1887- Update &#124; Calibre 11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 01:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calibre11.com/?p=1181#comment-270</guid>
		<description>[...] on the Calibre 1887 controversy, which if you&#8217;re not familiar with you can read about at this link where the story first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the Calibre 1887 controversy, which if you&#8217;re not familiar with you can read about at this link where the story first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: over sunglasses</title>
		<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>over sunglasses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calibre11.com/?p=1181#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Hi, I applaud your blog for informing people, very interesting article, keep up it coming :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, I applaud your blog for informing people, very interesting article, keep up it coming <img src='http://calibre11.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TAG Heuer caliber 1887 &#124; Watch.ph</title>
		<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>TAG Heuer caliber 1887 &#124; Watch.ph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calibre11.com/?p=1181#comment-251</guid>
		<description>[...] made. J.C.Babin, TAG Heuer&#8217;s CEO, also mingles in the discussion on Watchuseek and on weblog Calibre 11, a watch weblog entirely dedicated to Heuer and TAG Heuer. He speaks about the modifications made [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made. J.C.Babin, TAG Heuer&#8217;s CEO, also mingles in the discussion on Watchuseek and on weblog Calibre 11, a watch weblog entirely dedicated to Heuer and TAG Heuer. He speaks about the modifications made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TAG Heuer’s new 100% in-house designed caliber 1887… OUCH! &#124; Watch.ph</title>
		<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/comment-page-1/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>TAG Heuer’s new 100% in-house designed caliber 1887… OUCH! &#124; Watch.ph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 06:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calibre11.com/?p=1181#comment-250</guid>
		<description>[...] Kyle Stults of Perpetuelle did a very nice job on describing the whole matter in a blog post on his website. Click here for Kyle&#8217;s article, &#8220;TAG Heuer shoots itself in the foot on Tag Heuer Caliber 1887 launch&#8221;. Also check-out TAG Heuer devote website Calibre11.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kyle Stults of Perpetuelle did a very nice job on describing the whole matter in a blog post on his website. Click here for Kyle&#8217;s article, &#8220;TAG Heuer shoots itself in the foot on Tag Heuer Caliber 1887 launch&#8221;. Also check-out TAG Heuer devote website Calibre11.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hodinkee Recommended Reading: &#34;Tag Heuer Shoots Itself In The Foot&#34; on Perpetuelle.com &#124; Watch.ph</title>
		<link>http://www.calibre11.com/1887-calibre/comment-page-1/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Hodinkee Recommended Reading: &#34;Tag Heuer Shoots Itself In The Foot&#34; on Perpetuelle.com &#124; Watch.ph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calibre11.com/?p=1181#comment-249</guid>
		<description>[...] PR nightmare is that the CEO of Tag Heuer, JC Babin has admitted on the Heuer-enthusiast site Calibre11.com that the new Tag Heuer Caliber 1887 IS indeed based on a Seiko movement.&#160; So then what gives? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PR nightmare is that the CEO of Tag Heuer, JC Babin has admitted on the Heuer-enthusiast site Calibre11.com that the new Tag Heuer Caliber 1887 IS indeed based on a Seiko movement.&nbsp; So then what gives? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

