Series Overview: TAG Heuer 4000

Posted by: DC   |   5 February 2011   |   29 Comments  

The TAG Heuer 4000 series

launched in 1990 as a mid-range sports watch. Despite being part of the range until 1998/9, the 4000 is one of the lesser-known models of the 1990s and perhaps suffers from not really having its own distinct identity. Trivia buffs know the 4000 as being one of the only mainstream Heuer or TAG Heuer watch ranges to never offer a Chronograph model (the 1000/ 1500 Series being others).

Despite this, the 4000 is one of my favourite watches, mainly because it was my first proper watch and my first TAG Heuer. I bought mine 15 years ago and wore it every day for about six years. In that time, the battery has probably been replaced two or three times, but apart from that its been faultless and still looks pretty good today.

So, let’s put aside any sentimental aspects and take a look at the 4000 as a watch rather than as a fond memory.

4000 Series Overview

The 4000 was released at the height of TAG Heuer’s fascination with the “Six Features” design philosophy, with each feature present and accounted for. As well as being the “middle child” between the 2000 and S/el series in terms of price, the style of the 4000 borrows from each of these other series- a more up-market, softer and rounder satin-finish case than the 2000, but without the quirky, distinctive lugs or bracelet of the S/el.

The 4000 range was very straight forward- there was one basic design offered in three sizes, with either a Quartz or Automatic movement and with various case and dial colours. Checking the reference numbers on the 4000 series is complicated by the change in naming convention in 1992. Early watches (1990-92), such as the ones featured in the catalogue shots below have the Reference numbers XXX.XXX, where:

  • 1st Digit: Movement (9= Quartz; 6= Automatic)
  • 2nd Digit: Series (9 = 4000 Series)
  • 3rd Digit: Bezel/ case (9= Stainless steel; 5= Gold/ Stainless steel two-tone; 4 = Gold)
  • 4th Digit = Dial colour (2= Grey, 7 = White, 4= Gold)
  • 5th and 6th Digits: Case Size: (06 = Full size; 13 = Mid; 08 = small)

So, the 999.206 in the photo below is a Quartz 4000 with a Full-Size stainless steel case and the Grey (probably more of an Anthracite) dial.

Post 1992, the naming convention changed to the system still used today, so the 999.206 would become the WF1111. For the details of how to interpret the THs reference numbers, take a look here.

The Automatic version of the 4000 featured an ETA 2824 movement- the same movement still used today as the Calibre 5. As well as the obvious “automatic” on the dial (Quartz has “professional”), the 4000 Automatic had a slightly different dial design, with an inner minute scale added. While this made the Automatic stand out, it did lose some of the purity of the Quartz version.

The Quartz version also had a metal border around the hourly lume markers, while the Automatic went without.

While the watch was mainly sold with a stainless steel bracelet, it was also offered with a leather or Sharkskin strap.

Up Close with the 4000 Quartz

This watch is a WF1112 4000 Quartz from 1995. The only real signs of wear are to the enamel of the Green and Red logo at 12 o’clock that dominates the design of the watch. The Green “TAG” logo sits on the watch itself, while the Red “Heuer” logo sits on the Bezel. Over 15 years I haven’t been able to work out if I like having the logo there, or whether it looks too crass to have the logo both on the dial and on the case. Either way, it’s perhaps the only unique design feature of the 4000.

When you wear the watch its obvious that it’s from a different era- it’s far lighter and thinner than the watches of today, although it doesn’t feel too small, with a diameter of 40mm.

Not much to see at the back- clear case backs were still a long way away in 1995.

Legacy

The 4000 series was effectively replaced in 1997 by the Jorg Hysek-designed Kirium, a successful design that offered a far greater number of models that the 4000 ever did. I don’t know why TAG never added different dial designs, movements or colours over the eight years- there wasn’t even the option of a Chronometre model- perhaps the 4000 just wasn’t that successful, or simply got lost between the hugely successful 2000 Series and the more up-market S/el- the difficult middle child. Take a look at the photo below- at a glance, can you tell which is the 4000?

While I doubt there will be a 4000 re-edition any time soon, the watch still looks contemporary and new-near examples are widely available in the $300-$500 range, which will give you a lot of watch for the price.

The 1990s won’t remembered as an era of great TAG Heuer watches, but there are the occasional gems to be found, and for me the 4000 is one of them.

For more photos of the 4000 Quartz, click here.

 

***


Follow Me on Pinterest
Be Sociable, Share!
Home » 4000 Series, Series Overview

29 Comments »

  • Kyle S. said:

    Great story/review. Reminds me of when I bought my first TAG, a blue-dialed 1000 series, also in 1996. It is still my daily wearer. When I bought it, I remember aspiring to be able to get the 4000 series! Your story brought back some great memories!

  • DC (author) said:

    Thanks Kyle. I guess its like many things- you never forget your first. I’ve owned lots more watches since I got my 4000, but I don’t think any purchase has been as exciting as that one. And that watch got wrapped in cotton wool like nothing since.

    Guess that’s the life of a watch junkie- roaming around trying to find the next hit that brings back the feeling of the first!

    dc

  • Enrico said:

    Great article, as usual, David. I personally love the TAG Heuer line from the 90′s ! Maybe because it was when I got into them. Late 90′s.

  • james said:

    David,

    Good article, i’m with you on the tag heuer logo on the case, i dislike it immensely, reason?, every fake watch around the 90′s tried to copy this case, sadly.

    James.

  • Himawan said:

    Great review, David.

    This also reminds me of my first TAG Heuer 2000 chrono. Very reliable and still wear it sometimes, even feel too small compared to today’s watches.

  • DC (author) said:

    Thanks for your commments Gentlemen,

    Must confess that I’ve also been looking at some NOS 6000 series that are being offered on Ebay- again, great value.

    I’m planning a review on the 2000 Series…but its takling forever given how complex and diverse that model range is..one day soon I promise

    David

  • Chris said:

    Thanks for the info. I’ve had one of these for years, bought it at a pawn shop in 2000 for $225. It’s my alternate. All I need to do is replace the leather strap. My “daily driver” is a 1983-ish 2000 Chrono, black dial with a stainless “jubilee”-like bracelet. I wear it every day still.

  • DC (author) said:

    Hi Chris, they’re great value aren’t they?

    dc

  • Tony said:

    Hi David,
    Thanks for all this info. I got my WF2110-k (any idea what the -k references?) in Dubai 15 years ago – when the fakes were all the rage… Saved a lot of questions about the cost of it ;-)

    It’s been used all the time & I must get it serviced, hence my web search which found your blog. Enameled logo a bit warn & the crown wheel has stiffened up.

    Tony

  • Tyler said:

    Great article, brings me back to my first watch. A 1500 series given to me by my father when I entered college. I wear it every day, next year it will turn 20 years old so I’m not too afraid of scratches and such.

  • DC (author) said:

    Hi Tony- I’m not sure on the -k suffix…sometimes the letters indicate different movements, sometimes its a change in case…let me see what I can find out.

    Hey Tyler- yep, my father gave me the 4000 you see above too…and like you say, a few scratches don’t matter.

    Cheers

  • NP said:

    DC,
    thanks for this article, until reading it, i had know idea what watch my dad have given me.

    my father just recently gave me his gold faced two toned 4000 series watch.. and all i can say it is a marvellous watch!

  • George said:

    Hello!

    Thanks for the well informed article.

    Could you please tell me if the watch that my grandad has given me is mechanical or quartz?

    WD1211.BA0610 (grey)

    thank you!

  • DC (author) said:

    Hi George.

    Its a quartz…are you sure on that code?

    Your code WD1211 says:
    W= Watch (i.e not a Chronograph)
    D= Should be for a 1500 series…the 4000 series is “F”
    1= Quartz
    2= Midsize
    1= Stainless Steel
    1= Dial colour

    David

  • Wes said:

    Thanks for the article. I thought you stole my watch since you have the exact model as mine and the red paint around the “E” is missing in the exact same spot!

    This is my first, and still only, nice watch. I bought mine in late 1997 and I’ve worn it almost every day. The crystal is flawless. The internal fingers in the bezel ring broke a long time ago. My local watchmaker couldn’t repair it, so I just let it be. The rest of the watch is in fantastic condition considering it’s almost 15 years old of daily use.

    After the Kirium, I simply didn’t like where Tag was going with their designs. But I saw the Formula 1 Stealth a few days ago and have been drooling for one ever since. While my 4000 may be considered on the lower end compared to many brands/models today, I still love it as much as I did when I first put it on.

  • DC (author) said:

    Hi Wes,

    Sounds like there is a design flaw on the “E”!

    The Kirium was a nice evolution of the 2000/4000/6000 shape…and you’re right that after that the focus went away from this design and on to the re-edition style.

    I still wear mine from time-to-time as well.

    Enjoy!

    David

  • Greg said:

    I am wearing a 4000 Profesional 995.713 A I have had since 1993. My wife bought it forme on our honemoon. I love this watch and have worn it everyday. It is now time for replacement battery number three. The colors on the logo are wearing and my bezel no longer ratchets. I have tried other Tags lately but nothing compares the thin, light styling of the 4000.

  • Scott said:

    Hi David.

    I got mine in 1991, on holiday in Australia (Brisbane). Mine was automatic with gold (bezel) crown and a golden inner cirkel.

    I had mine regulary serviced (3-4 years periods). It was in mecanicaly in mint condition, with some exterioer wear.

    3 weeks ago i was assulted and robbed downtown Oslo (Norway), they nicked about 100 USD and my watch. I miss it, it became a part of me. Every day (except service time) for 21 years. A great watch.

    I have insurance that covers the finacial value, but I really miss my watch. Do you know where, and how I can get a hold of a pricelist, or retail prices in europe from the year 1991?

    Best regards
    Scott

  • john said:

    Hi David
    Can you confirm that my 4000 quartz is not a fake my number is WF1212-KO
    MANY THANKS JOHN

  • DC (author) said:

    Hi Scott,

    Pleased that “all” that happened to you was the loss of some cash and a watch- no matter how special. I don’t have a 1991 Catalogue, but I do have a 1997 Price List posted that gives some prices for the 4000 Series:

    http://www.calibre11.com/tag-heuer-catalogues/?album=3&gallery=43

    If you haven’t done so already, take a look at the Catalogue page, as there is a 4000-Series brochure there.

    David

  • paul said:

    Hi Dave
    My tag 4000 994.706k is the case gold plated or solid gold?
    It’s got a leather strap and is in good condition no scratches. I have not worn it for a while as i need to invest in a new battery.

  • Scott said:

    Thanks David.

    It was helpfull.

    Best regads Scott

  • Walter Graf said:

    I have had the automatic version since 1998. A great watch that Recently was overhauled. I need a spring bar for the bracelet. Does anyone know which size I need? Thanks

  • DC (author) said:

    Hi Walter,

    The full-size model has 20mm lugs.

    Cheers

    David

  • Walter Graf said:

    Thanks David!
    Walter

  • RKS said:

    Thanks for the great write-up. My wife bought me the 4000 as an engagement gift and it lasted until a game of tackle football about 5 years ago. I lost the spring bar/ last link at the ‘top’ of the watch. I was quoted $300 since the entire band has to be replaced. Are there any other options? I remember sending the watch to Chicago for a new battery. Any recommendations for service?

    thanks again.

  • DC (author) said:

    RKS, sounds like a big price- a 4000 in good condition on eBay probably only sells for a little more than this.

    Not sure where you live, but your best bet will be a local TAG Heuer dealer. TAG themselves may have the part…have you checked with them?

    dc

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.