Hands-on Review: Aquaracer 500m Ceramic Bezel

One of TAG Heuer’s most popular watches has been updated for 2012/ 2013- the Aquaracer 500m watch. The new model brings several improvements from the current series, most notably the use of a slimmer case and a new ceramic bezel.

The automatic Aquaracer range used to be straightforward, with two distinct choices: a case design evolved from the original Heuer/ TAG Heuer 2000 (rated to water resistance of 300m), or a larger, more angular case (rated to 500m) that boasted an innovative rubber bezel and helium escape valve. Now with the 2012 Aquaracer 500m, those lines have been blurred.

TAG Heuer Aquaracer 500m CeramicThe second generation 500m is based on the Aquaracer 300m, rather than being a distinct design. While the new watch looks great, it’s now a variation of the other Aquaracers- so does that mean the new series a step forwards or backwards?


As regular readers will know, the Aquaracer series began its life as the Heuer 2000 series in 1982. The 2000 was the last watch released by Heuer under the stewardship of Jack Heuer, and evolved into the TAG Heuer 2000 in 1986 (above). As part of the new naming strategy to distance TAG Heuer from the 1000/ 15000/ 2000/ 4000/ 6000 era, the 2000 series was relaunched as the Aquaracer at the end of 2004.

The 2000/ Aquaracer models always stayed true to the original case design, simply updating movements, finishes and dial designs along the way. This changed in 2009 when the Aquaracer 5oom family was launched- here was a larger, squared-edged case with a rubber bezel, over-sized crown and helium-escape valve (see below).

The 500m models gave the Aquaracer series a bolder, more modern design and one that proved popular, with both a quartz and automatic range of watches, including the “Full Black” Aquaracer with its bright lime highlights. The series was a winner. So why have TAG Heuer changed the formula?


Let’s clear up one of the key questions about the new watch: the new Aquaracer 500m uses the same case as the Aquaracer 300m series, but with a thicker case back and bezel. If you think of the watch in three sections (case back, case and bezel), then the only external difference between the case of the two variants is the helium valve on the 500m models.

Inside the case, many components (such as gaskets) have been beefed up on the 500m to ensure water resistance to a greater depth.

It also means a 41mm case (down from 43mm) and the sharp edges of the out-going series replaced by the gentle curves of the original Heuer 2000. The similarities between the Aquaracer 300m and new 500m watches are clear when you see the two together:

The 500m does score unique sword-shaped hands and carries over the design of the arrow-tipped sweeping seconds hand from the first generation Aquaracer 500m.

The dial design is also new. The first-gen model (below) has a bold vertical patterning, which has been replaced by toned-down horizontal effect on the new watches.

The streaks are smaller than those on the 300m model and work well in giving the dial a more classical look (below).

The date window on the new 500m moves back to the traditional 3 o’clock position and the dial loses the “500m” bridge that linked the centre-stem to the date window. And speaking of date windows, the cyclops is gone.

Another detailed change is the reversion to a printed “TAG Heuer” logo rather than the applied logo of the first-gen watch.

Moving away from the dial, one of the most significant improvements to the watch is the new bezel-insert, where the hard rubber bezel has been replaced by a great-looking ceramic bezel in the traditional dive-watch style. For me, this is a huge improvement and one advocated two years ago when Calibre 11 reviewed the 500m Chronograph:

“A quick word about the bezel- one of the controversial features of the Aquaracer 500m series. The bezel is a hard rubber finish that looks great with the applied silver markers and the exposed screw-heads. But while the design works well as a diving watch, it doesn’t look as up-market as a traditional metal bezel. I would have kept this distinctive bezel design as a feature of the 500m watch and used a ceramic bezel on the Chronograph version to distinguish it from the basic watch and give the Chronograph a more up-market appearance.”

Being ceramic, the new bezel has a smooth, “glassy” finish and the added benefit of being significantly harder (and therefore more scratch resistant) than a traditional aluminum bezel.

Comparing the Aquaracer 500m Ceramic

Nothing sums up the slimmer design of the new Aquaracer 500m watch more clearly than the photo above, which shows the new watch on the right and the current Aquaracer 500m Chronograph on the left. Sure, Chronographs are usually thicker than 3-hand watches, but the difference is stark.

The photo above shows the new Aquaracer 500m (right) up against the 300m Aquaracer (left). Note how the 500m sits higher thanks to its thicker caseback. You can also clearly see the differences in the bezel design and thickness.

And, for the vintage buffs, here is the new Aquaracer 500m up against the Heuer 1000m deep dive watch from the early 1980s. Considered an over-sized “tool watch” in its day, the Heuer 1000m is about the same size as the new Aquaracer. Take a look at the same vintage Heuer alongside the Aquaracer 500m Chronograph (below).

TAG Heuer boast that the new Aquaracer 500m is the thinnest automatic watch rated to 500m water resistance, and there is no doubt that after an era of over-sized diver watches, the new model looks and feels considerably lighter. Whether you consider the new design classical or conservative, there is no doubt that it’s a good-looking watch.

Aquaracer 500m WAK2110- Black Dial

The most popular version of the new series will almost certainly be the black dial/ black bezel version- almost the default colour combination for dive watches (think Rolex Submariner and Omega Planet Ocean). It’s my favourite of the new range (although I would love to have seen the titanium Full Black version) and looks great.

In addition to the black-dial model above, the stainless steel Aquaracer 500m is also available with a blue dial that  is teamed with a great-looking blue bezel.

Aquaracer 500m WAK2121- Champagne Dial

As an alternative to stainless steel, there are two Steel & Gold (Plated) models available- one with a blue dial and the second (a dealer special order) with a “Champagne”- coloured dial.

While I’ve never been a fan of the bi-metal look, TAG Heuer has offered this variation for more than 30 years now and there is certainly a market for the Gold and Steel look- especially on watches aimed at the Yachting market.


The new Aquaracer 500m retains the dive-helmet design of the 300m model, losing the sapphire case-back of the first-gen watch. As you can see, apart from the thickness, the two designs are identical (new 500m above left).


As regular readers will know, TAG Heuer is in a phase of moving away from ETA movements, which will mean more in-house movements (such as the Calibre “1888”) and a greater spread of movements from specialists such as Sellita, Soprod and Dubois-Depraz.

Like the Aquaracer 300m, the new 500m model uses TAG Heuer’s Calibre 5 movement (shown above in the first-gen Aquaracer 500m), which can be either an ETA 2824-2 or the Sellita equivalent, the SW200. The movements are being used interchangeably, so  two identical watches in a store may have movements from different suppliers. Expect the balance between ETA and Sellita to tilt heavily towards Sellita as ETA supply winds down.

The quartz version of the Aquaracer 500m has been dropped, consistent with the move towards an all-mechanical TAG Heuer range.

Straps & Bracelet

Given that the 500m shares its case with its 300m brother, its not surprising that the two models now also share bracelets and rubber straps.

The previous model had 21mm lugs, with the strap attaching to the case via removable “end-pieces” with exposed screw heads (below).

The new model is far simpler- fitting directly to the case-  and better for it.

On the Wrist

Having worn the Aquaracer 500m on both the rubber strap and bracelet, its the former that I prefer- more comfortable and to me, more in keeping with the spirit of the watch. The same watch as above on the bracelet is shown below:

I also threw the watch on an old NATO strap, which also looks pretty good (above). NATO straps tend to fall in and out of fashion quickly, but I can see the chance for TAG Heuer to add an up-market NATO-style option, as Tudor and IWC have done for some of their recent releases.

Price & Availability

There are three price points for the 2012/ 2013 Aquaracer 500m series- all prices in Swiss Francs:

  • Steel Case: CHF2,500
  • Titanium Full Black: CHF 2,900 (below)
  • Steel and Gold Plate: CHF 3,100
The watches will be available from October, with the Champagne Dial Steel and Gold watch shown here being a special order.
There have been some questions on whether the new Aquaracer 500m will complement the existing WAJ2XXX range, perhaps replacing the current Aquaracer 300m series: No, this 500m range replaces the current “WAJ” series and the Aquaracer 300m will continue.


So, let’s return to the question posed at the start of the review: is the new TAG Heuer Aquaracer 500m ceramic a step forward from the first-generation watch? In short, yes, I believe the combination of a ceramic bezel (which needs to be seen in person to appreciate what a difference it makes) and a less fashion-orientated design does make the new watch one that I would buy ahead of the current watch.

But, there is no doubt that the new watch does not stand out from the crowd as much as the current model. It has all the “standard” diving watch features and looks…but what makes the new model distinct from others? The trade-off of this is that it’s not yet clear how several of the design flourishes on the first-gen Aquaracer 500m will look in 10 years time. The new design is far more classic.

This trend towards classic design continues the path established by the 2011 Link and 2012 Formula 1 models, each of which were more conservative designs, less “trendy” and featured smaller-diameter cases.

While a successful re-design, it does rob the Aquaracer range of some distinctiveness, so it will be interesting to see what other Aquaracer models TAG Heuer plans for 2013. There is no reason not to expect a revised 500m Chronograph to follow the same path as the 3-hand watch, but there is still space for a true, hard-core model to follow in the steps of the Super Professional and Aquagraph.



  • AussieAlex

    A step in the right direction, I think, but I also feel it would look better with a glossy ceramic dial to match the bezel.

    The old model with the grooved rubber bezel worked well with the grooved vertical dial.

    I don't think you can say the same for the new model – but then maybe that's just me?

  • Wilfreb

    Too small for these days, sorry, I own the original 500m and feels about ok but now at 41??? I mean wtf.

    I'm now using a Role DeepSea 44" and I don't see myself wearing a watch smaller than this.

  • Robert

    I also think that this is a step in the right direction. I'm waiting for the 7750-based chronograph (I prefer ETA to Sellita though), with the TOP/CHRONOMETER version, because of the Glucydur balance, not necessarily with certificate, but surely with day-date features.

    I used to have the previous, day-date 300 meter chronograph version, black dial but sold it. Had problems with the too easily turning bezel, the way too shiny calendar frame and the weak lume both on hands and hour markers.

    On this model I see signs that make me optimistic regarding the much nicer bezel, and (similar to the previous 500 m model) larger lume area on hour markers and hands. I'm a bracelet guy and I was satisfied with the bracelet. But I have serious problems with the Helium valve of the recent models and the future model too:

    1. makes the design asymmetric

    2. makes the design an "Omega fake"

    3. an additional point of water hazard

    4. makes additional cost for the buyer

    5. makes additional cost for the owner at sealing kit replacements

    6. completely superfluous for the average TH buyer, I think 99.999%.

    So I hope that at least the chronograph will not have this Helium valve. (If you remember the Certina DS-3 re-issues a few years ago, the 3-hand model had the (sunk, that is recessed) Helium valve while the ETA-7750 chronograph version did not have a Helium valve at all. If TAG-Heuer wants the Helium valve, I think the very best place would be for a recessed valve (like a. o. the Sea-Dweller, the mentioned DS-3, the Breitling Superocean and others) at 9 o'clock, thus giving a function for the extra steel part of the case at 9.

    I wonder what will happen… If all these come true I'm a possible TH-owner again. And I wonder when the new and newer manufacture chronograph calibers will have the week-day feature.

    Best regards,


  • Robert

    Seeing the comments on size I'd like to say that I'd prefer a 40-42 mm to the larger ones. I wear watches between 36 and 45.5 mm but prefer the mentioned size. Because of multiple preferences many manufacturers produce same watches with different sizes. (E. g. Planet Oceans, Yacht Master and others.)

    So an Aquaracer Chrono Valjoux TOP Day-Date, blue, black or blue/black dial in 42 mm with ceramic bezel, without or sunk Helium valve on bracelet would be highly welcome for me…



  • John L.

    Don't like it. Too small and no originality… Don't like horizontal stripes, prefer the vertical ones on the older 500M much better. I would buy the previous generation of 500M for more rugged look and bigger size.

  • Mike K

    I like the new design but I also liked the old design a lot. I think there would have been room in the aquaracer line for both models, one on the classy side and the other on the rugged side.

  • Thanks for the comments everyone.

    No doubt, this is a step backwards if you like big watches. There does seem to be a general consensus that sizes are coming down, but who knows?

    – Robert, we can only assume that there will be a revised Aquaracer 500m Chronograph in the next year or so…but not sure if it will have the 7750, given the cut-back by ETA. Yes, helium valve is not needed for 99% of us…but given that the 500m and 300m cases are so similar, it wouldn't surprise me if they kept the helium valve to help differentiate

    I will try and get an interview with Jean-Christophe Babin so that he can tell us more about what the thinking is behind the new series.


  • Jorge

    Seeing the history picture reminded me of how much I liked the old bracelet vs the new. I like the direction they went but the watch doesn't stand out because it doesn't have its own character.

    Give this new watch the old style bracelet but done with today's tooling. Bring back the softened edge hour markers and get the color coded TAG Heuer symbol back on the dial and I'm in line for one.

  • Hi Jorge, agree that it doesn't stand out as much as the old one did. Interesting to see that TH used the colour logo again on the Formula 1 models…maybe they'll use it sparing on new models?

  • Fábio

    Personally I did not like the old design, I think the watch had some details that lose the professional look of the machine, and in my case was fundamental to the decision to not buy the watch, I apologize. I really liked the new model, I might buy.

  • Peter

    Thanks for the review. I just saw these 500m firsthand today. I am surprised you compared these more to the 300m WAPs. I think they're closer to the WAN series, at least visually.

  • What did you think Peter? I saw the blue dial for the first time on Friday and still like it even though the blue is more "purple" than I expected.

    Yes, they have the Black bezel like the WAN but the rest of the watch (including the dial) is closer to the WAP…maybe its more accurate to say that its a mix between the two.


  • Peter

    You're right, sir. It is a hybrid of the two. Hands and bezel from one and the dial and hour markers from the other.

    Yes, the purplish dial caught me off guard seeing it. The two-tone with blue dial is not as nice as the picture on their website. I liked the all black 500m. I didn't ask to hold it as was afraid I will like it more.

    Your pic of the watch with the NATO strap is great. That black NATO will look good on the all black 500m too.

  • Henry

    I love the new ceramic dial with the horizontal lines. Gives it an interesting look. I think the horizontal lines is one of the reasons why I purchased my Aqua Racer Grand Date.

    I agree with Wilfreb. 41mm size is a step backward. I'm not a fan of the huge watches but I think 43-45mm is the sweet spot for me.

    At first glance, I thought this would be a good option as my next watch but after seeing the size, I think the Planet Ocean with a rubber strap is my next purchase.

  • Neil

    Hi great review.

    Can I ask if the new AR500 ceramic has any AR coating on the crystal, even if only on the underside?

    Also what kind of accuracy can i expect from the cal5 movement?

    I know it's not COSC but do they typically perform within COSC?




  • Hi Neil,

    I believe it does have AR- but best to confirm with a dealer.

    Yes, the Calibre 5- like most decent Swiss movements- can perform to COSC, irrespective of whether it has been certified.

    It may perform a little outside this range, but only by a few seconds a day. Any readers with experience of their Calibre 5 accuracy?


    • Gary Wright

      Just reading through and I know this is a two year old thread, but I bought my AR 500m two weeks ago. It gains 2 secs a day if I put it crown down at night, loses 1 sec crown up or upright…. I love this watch

    • Richard

      I have had my AR 500m for just over 2 years, it has worked perfectly, but just recently there has been some big lapses in time, for instance, yesterday noticed that it had lost over 55mins and this is a watch I wear everyday all day, I only take it off at night!

      • Yes, something has gone wrong. My wife dropped her watch last week and it was losing a similar amount of time. Time to visit your local watchmaker (unfortunately)

  • Tushar

    Hi David,
    I bought this watch a few months ago, and I can share my experience here. My reference point is another TAG which I have for a few months more, the Carrera Heritage Calibre 6.
    The Aquaracer, though a bit bulky fits the wrist much better than the Carerra due to the small adjustments available on the clasp, so wearing this watch is a pleasure. It is very attractive looking too. I time both my watches with an app on my iPhone.

    I have found that the AR gains almost 10 seconds in 24 hours. My Carerra on the other hand doesn’t differ by more than 2 seconds, even after one week.

    The only nagging issue I have with my AR is the power reserve. Though the company claims a reserve of 30 hours, in practice I barely manage 12-18 hours. So if I don’t wear the watch daily for some time, the watch stops.

  • wilfreb

    the new Aquaracers looks uninspiring, the more i look at my 500M [original 43mm] the more i realize that Tag went lazy with this one.

    i men, look at the gorgeous transparent caseback on the original, the superbly decorated Calibre 5 movement, and all the details and fit and finish on the whole timepiece, it says how hard TagHeuer worked on that particular design, i men its a 100% original design like no other thing out there.

    the new ones looks unispired, boring and lost all the fine and unique aspects of the original 500M.

  • Niall

    I think the new Aquaracer looks boring in its current form. A cyclops over the date window would change this and give it a more authentic divers look as well as making it a more premium looking watch.

  • Agree with you both- I put the same question to new CEO Stephane Linder here:

  • Roman

    I think the aquaracer is a pain in the butt, regarding the automatic movement. If you have the money go for a Omega, Rolex or even a Breitling.

    • Julius Swerving

      First, you’d still have the “pain in the butt” problem buying the brands you mentioned. Second, they’re at much higher price points. Not really comparable.

  • Mark

    In the last 23 days my WAK2121 has gained 2min, just over 5 seconds a day. The way all your comments read my aquaracer must be the only one that’s performing within COSC specs. Does that mean its a limited edition??? Ha ha ha!

  • Rocco

    Simplicity is a fundamental requirement for a dive
    watch(large bezel, clear time markings, large easily visible hands)
    Unnecessary details on a dive watch are like big rims and spoilers
    on a 1.3 Corsa- just for show. If you're looking for a
    bling watch with fancy detailing then buy a dress watch. TH
    removing the irrelevant cosmetic details makes for a more credible
    and professional looking time piece so bought a new 2nd gen
    Aquaracer 500m WAK2110 (Can't quite afford a Sea Dweller
    or Omega yet) Very happy with my purchase, excellent functional and
    beautiful watch.

    • calibre11

      Hi Rocco- yes, agree with you the clarity point, which is why generally I prefer a 3-hand dive watch to a chrono. Enjoy!